Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Subscribe in NewsGator Online

Add to 
Google

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 10/2004

Pages

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

« May 2007 | Main | July 2007 »

June 24, 2007

World's Whiniest Workers

Mon dieu! A study has found that France has the world's whiniest workers, but before you start making jokes about the French finally winning at something, take a look at where U.S. workers ranked.

FDS International, a company in the United Kingdom that conducts market research, recently published the results of its study of work attitudes among nearly 14,000 employees in 23 countries.

According to the study, the 11 countries with the most demanding--or whiniest--workers are:

1. France
2. United Kingdom (tie)
2. Sweden (tie)
4. United States
5. Australia (tie)
5. Portugal (tie)
7. Canada(tie)
7. Greece(tie)
9. Poland
10. Germany (tie)
10. Spain (tie)

The firm created the ranking by looking at the percentage of workers unhappy with pay, actual income relative to cost of living, percentage of workers who feel work impinges on private life, and average weekly working hours.

You can find the least whiney workers in Ireland, according to the study. Workers in the Netherlands and Thailand are also among the least whiney.

The Netherlands has workers with the highest morale, the study found. Irish and Thai workers have the second highest morale. Japanese workers had the lowest.

More about Whining Workers

June 13, 2007

Baby Booms and Busts Drive Workforce Projections

According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the following events will occur during the month of JUNE 2007:
One birth every...................................    7 seconds
One death every..................................  13 seconds
One international migrant (net) every.......  27 seconds
Net gain of one person every..................  10 seconds
Birth rates show the waves of demographic changes since 1920.  The following "waves" contributed in large part to the impending Perfect Labor Storm.
Birth dearth: reduction of birthrates in the late 1920s and early
1930s
Baby boom: 1964-1964
Baby bust: 1965-1975
Baby boom echo: late 1980s and 1990s

Generational Workplace Woes: Geezers vs. Geeks

As a result of efforts to retain aging workers longer and to fill the new jobs being created as well as replace retiring workers, the workforce is becoming much more multigenerational. Today, we have four distinct generations sharing the workplace: the "Traditional" older workers, the Baby Boomers, Generation X, and Generation Y (also called the "Millennials" or the "Net" generation.) This means that the workplace will be increasingly characterized not just by an aging workforce, but also by increased age diversity.

According to a survey by Lee Heckt Harrison, more than 60% of employers say they are experiencing tension between employees from different generations. The older generation has always complained about the younger one, but, in the modern workplace, the misunderstanding works both ways. Today, you might have a fresh college graduate managing a person thirty, or even forty years older! It can be difficult, on both sides, to handle the disparities of this reality.

I recently overheard the following discussion that summed up the problem. Common conversation between "seasoned" workers is that "I can't find young people to put in a good week's work anymore" (aka - 60-hour work week). To that young Millenials reply: "I will work 60 hours if I have too!" What Gen Ys are really saying is "I'm sorry it takes you 60 hours to complete in what takes me only 40 hours." Gen Ys will work long and hard - they just don't want it to be a way of life.

This generational "crowding" is making for some major conflict and miscommunication in the workplace. That's because each generation has its own distinct set of values, shaped by their unique social conditions, political events, economic conditions, major crises and childhood experiences. Each generation also reacts to the generation before them, and this reaction becomes part of its own identity and defining characteristics. These differences can lead to major misunderstandings between coworkers raised in different eras.

Authors Warren Bennis and Robert Thomas have their own unique view of this situation. They see the generation gap as being between what they call the "geeks" (the younger, "digital" generations) and the "geezers" (the older, "analog" generations.) The analog world in which today's older generations grew up was primarily linear. It rewarded specialization and experience, followed a mechanical understanding of the world, and favored organizational hierarchy. The digital world of the younger generations is nonlinear; it favors a flat organizational structure and rewards the generalist with the beginner's mind. Rather than a mechanical view of the world, it favors a more fluid and changing "living systems" model. This is a major paradigm shift that increasingly divides different generations in the workplace.

Managing this conflict, and finding ways to value the unique contributions made by these four unique generations in the workforce, will be a challenge for all businesses in the future. To learn more about bridging generational gaps and reducing workplace conflict, got to http://www.super-solutions.com/generationalstyleassessment.asp or call 800.803.4303.

June 02, 2007

Why aren't HR professionals the sharpest tacks in organizations?

Human resource professionals talk a lot about "being at the table" since they are in fact responsible for an organization's "most important assets."  But being at the table means being able to think like a business person, not just a social worker or a compliance cop.  Now that doesn't mean HR should only be thinking about the numbers because making sure every employee is happy and satisfied and all the i's are dotted and t's crossed makes great business sense.  The problem is that many employees chose an HR career because they like people and dislike math, analytics, and confrontation.  Others had the career chosen for them - they are nice and dedicated and hard-working but didn't really have the skills to fit anywhere else so they were assigned to HR.

I recognize how generalized and broad those accusations are but I also can't tell you how many times I have heard from HR generalists that " I chose HR because I like helping people" or just "I like people."  I also continually hear from HR employees "that I'm not very good at math" or "that's accounting's job" explaining why HR was a logical career choice.  Sorry....today's HR professional requires great communication skills - verbal and written, as well as business acumen and critical thinking skills. 

This morning I received notice about a new blog, HRmanagementtoday.com.  One of its first posts was titled "Why We Hate HR?"  An excerpt from it includes:

Here’s why. HR people aren’t the sharpest tacks in the box. If you are an ambitious new graduate from a top college or B-school with your eye on a rewarding career in business, your first instinct is not to go into human resources (at the University of Michigan’s Ross School of Business, which arguably boasts the nation’s top faculty for organizational issues, just 1.2% of 2004 grads did so). Says a management professor at one leading school: “The best and the brightest don’t go into HR.”

Who does? Intelligent people, sometimes — but not business people. “HR doesn’t tend to hire a lot of independent thinkers or people who stand up as moral compasses,” says Garold L. Markle, a longtime human-resources executive........Read more.

More and more articles, white papers, and blogs seem to be posting similar themes. What do you think?  Is HR being unfairly attacked and criticized or is HR sinking its own boat?  Do you work in or with any organizations where HR functions and has the same respect as other C-level (CF), COO, CEO) exec?

I also published a recent article, Can HR Be Trusted to Get The Job Done?, about what HR needs to focus on if they are to become leaders within organizations and what they must be discussing in the board room. You might find good discussions points in it as well.